There is already a widespread and growing sense among the plebs that the courts are illegitimate. Unequal access to "justice", de facto unequal rights before the Law, ubiquitous use of coerced false confession ("plea bargain") in criminal prosecution, and the notorious American gulag all contribute to this sense.
Good comment thank you. It's very interesting across the board. There is the sense that our understandings of "de jure" justice and "de facto" justice have been inverted. Ultimately it depends upon the creators, technology, use cases, and user adoption that will determine how much ai/ml technologies will change this -- yet I suspect they will in the main as people become more educated in the law.
There is already a widespread and growing sense among the plebs that the courts are illegitimate. Unequal access to "justice", de facto unequal rights before the Law, ubiquitous use of coerced false confession ("plea bargain") in criminal prosecution, and the notorious American gulag all contribute to this sense.
Will AI make this better, or worse?
Good comment thank you. It's very interesting across the board. There is the sense that our understandings of "de jure" justice and "de facto" justice have been inverted. Ultimately it depends upon the creators, technology, use cases, and user adoption that will determine how much ai/ml technologies will change this -- yet I suspect they will in the main as people become more educated in the law.